→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Real Trade-Off

Many leaders treat mission as optics and revenue as mechanics — complementary yet separate. The commercial reality is blunter: when mission isn’t operationalised, it blurs who you serve, weakens pricing confidence, and nudges teams towards short-term wins that undercut long-term value. This isn’t just a branding concern, it’s a performance one. Gallup estimates that strategic misalignment strips up to $9.6 trillion from the global economy each year, which is a useful proxy for how diffuse intent silently erodes margin discipline and decision speed.

Make Mission Operate

Mission needs to behave like a filter for choices, not a statement on a wall. That means turning ideals into a simple, shared decision logic — the same logic guiding go-to-market, product and finance. You’re aiming for consistency that customers can feel and teams can follow under pressure.

A practical starting point:

• Define the few customer groups that matter and the unit of value they prize most (time saved, certainty, total cost).
• Make two lists: what you’ll pursue and what you’ll politely decline; socialise both so trade-offs are visible.
• Align handoffs across brand, product, marketing and sales so the value story remains intact from first click to renewal.

Pricing As Proof

Price is where your mission is either made tangible or quietly contradicted. If you claim to create certainty, discounting aggressively says the opposite; if you promise simplicity, a sprawling catalogue confuses. In our experience with mid-market organisations, margin stability improves when leaders treat pricing as proof of the promise rather than a lever to fix pipeline anxiety.

Translate that principle into practice:

• Set price guardrails tied to the outcome you deliver; reserve promotions for cases that amplify, not dilute, that outcome.
• Curate 1–2 flagship bundles that showcase the mission’s value in real use, not in theory.
• Retire variants that add complexity without advancing the promise or profit.

Leadership Implications

The long game favours clarity. Robert Collings’ academic review finds that mid‑market organisations aligning internal choices with external value grow revenue at roughly four times the median over a decade and are 14 times likelier to cross $100 million than their misaligned peers. That’s a scale signal worth heeding.

What senior teams should lock in next:

• Governance: anchor quarterly priorities to a single value narrative; fund fewer, bigger bets that serve it.
• Metrics: track proof of outcomes (before/after), not just activity; make it visible where decisions happen.
• Incentives: align compensation, promotions and vendor terms to deal quality, not volume alone.

Treat mission as the operating system for choices, and growth starts to look like compounding coherence rather than a string of tactical wins.

Sources:

• The $9.6 Trillion Strategic Alignment Opportunity — Gallup
• Market Orientation & Growth Capital: Strategic Alignment — Robert Collings Academic research

1. Aligning Brand and Strategy to Overcome Misalignment
2. Aligning Vision and Results to Prevent Brand Drift
3. Brand Playbooks: Aligning Strategy with Consistent Execution