Summary

At merger time, the reflex is to rebrand or fold everything under the biggest logo. The real issue is misaligned identity and unclear value. The shift comes when brand works as a decision system, setting the architecture and pacing the rollout. That’s how you regain pricing power, reduce complexity, and restore growth.

→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Real Decision

The most common shortcut is to keep the larger name or mint a new one. It feels neat, but it simplifies the wrong problem. The real decision is which brand construct will compound value over the next three years — not just reduce noise on day one. That choice affects pricing power, how buyers navigate your offer, what sales teams prioritise, and the degree of operational simplicity you can sustain.

Identity choices are also people choices. How you signal continuity, ambition and respect determines whether teams commit to a single story or defend old badges. Get that wrong and commercial momentum drifts; get it right and you create the rails your growth runs on.

Brand As Decision System

Treat brand not as a badge but as a decision system. Build a clear model that weighs customer overlap, segment-specific equity, future portfolio plans, channel realities, risk tolerance, and the cost and timing of change. Include legal constraints, partner expectations and the narrative you’ll ask customers to believe — with proof they can recognise.

McKinsey notes that while roughly 80% of companies finish a brand transition within 18 months of closing a deal, only about 40% ground positioning in evidence; those that combine creativity with data report making stronger brand choices. In our experience with leadership teams, the breakthrough is building simple rules that take opinion out of the room.

Signals To Watch

A few indicators help you choose with confidence:

• Favour integration when buyer overlap is high, one brand already commands a price premium in priority segments, and product roadmaps are converging.
• Favour a portfolio when segments have distinct willingness to pay, routes to market differ materially by region or channel, or legacy equity acts as useful risk insulation in tenders and regulated settings.
• If channel partners want one contract and one story, consolidation often unlocks faster deals and cleaner execution.

Leadership Moves

Culture determines whether the strategy travels: McKinsey reports that deals which actively manage culture are over 40% more likely to reach cost synergy goals and up to 70% more likely to hit revenue targets. Design governance that links the brand call to behaviour on the ground.

• Set brand‑architecture thresholds (by segment size, margin, or overlap) so integration or separation follows evidence, not preference.
• Map journeys and pricing ladders by region and channel to see precisely where brands help or hinder.
• Define a time‑bound transition narrative with customer proof points, then track six‑month outcomes: retention, win rates, cross‑sell and margin health.

Handled this way, the brand choice becomes a quiet multiplier of clarity and growth long after the deal papers are signed.

Sources:

• Why managing culture is critical for value creation in M&A — McKinsey
• Integrating marketing and brand in M&A: The way to superior growth — McKinsey

Further Resources

1. Brand Architecture for Scalability Post-M&A
2. Repositioning Your Brand for Growth Beyond the Familiar
3. Rebrand Strategy: Prioritising Impact Over Appearance

Curious how this applies in your market? We’re speaking with leaders across industries every week. Let’s talk.

Back to top