Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
The Real Trade-Off
When you move into a new segment, the instinct is to stretch the message so nothing feels excluded. The effect is the opposite: ambiguity multiplies, sales teams lose the thread, and the brand starts to blur. The more audiences you try to cover with one storyline, the more you dilute the choices that create relevance and, ultimately, pricing power. Harvard Business Review notes that brands signalling a clear, consistent stance can sustain around a 13% premium on price. That is the commercial dividend of focus: not fewer opportunities, but stronger ones.
One Value Story
The answer isn’t more words; it’s a single, decisive value story. That means choosing the segment problem you will own and stating what you will not chase. Keep the core narrative intact, then tailor the evidence around it. Precision liberates you: it gives sales permission to go deep, not broad, and it gives marketing a modular system that scales without fragmenting.
- Define the segment problem, the cost of inaction, and the outcome you deliver.
- Make explicit the opportunities you’ll pass on for now.
- Architect proof: use cases, references, and data ladders that map to the segment’s triggers.
- Adapt language by role (economic, technical, operational), not by adding new claims.
Tailor Without Diluting
Think modular, not maximal. Retain the same point of view across segments while swapping the proof and context. Product capability might be constant; risk, urgency and buying triggers will not. Tailoring at the level of evidence respects differences in motivation without rewriting the story each time.
Train commercial teams to leave legacy terms behind. Old-segment shorthand can quietly undermine credibility in a new market. A shared glossary, a few story patterns, and disciplined enablement will do more than another deck rewrite.
Leadership Implications
This is a leadership problem before it’s a messaging task. Most organisations we work with discover that ambiguity is less about wording and more about unmade choices. Treat message evolution as an operating decision: set a governance cadence, choose what to retire, and give teams cover to execute the change.
- Commit to one owned problem per segment and a shortlist of “not-yet” opportunities.
- Establish message governance: who decides, what gets measured, and when to retire language.
- Track consequences that matter: sales-cycle speed, win rates against target accounts, and price realisation, not just lead volume.
A message that travels well is built on a choice that travels first; as markets shift, the organisations that re-choose with clarity move faster and hold their value.
Sources: