Summary

When leadership changes in a B2B organisation, it’s tempting to assume the positioning will adapt and teams should press on with delivery. In practice, stories fragment and priorities drift. Once a codified, operational narrative is in place, coherence returns — because brand is the system that carries strategy.

→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Hidden Cost

Leadership transitions don’t automatically refresh market position; they expose whether your organisation has a coherent story that survives personalities. When a new leader arrives, absence of clear positioning pushes teams to retrofit messages around personal style. That’s where drift begins, not because intent is poor but because the system for carrying intent is thin.

We often see that the brand issues are less about a new leader’s style and more about translating strategy into everyday language. If the translation layer is weak, commercial efforts fragment, operations follow competing signals, and culture becomes cautious—slowing the very change a leadership shift is meant to accelerate.

Where Drift Creeps In

Misalignment rarely announces itself; it accumulates in small decisions that send different messages to clients and teams. Look for these early clues:

• Competitive bids reference different strengths depending on who leads the conversation.
• Priorities proliferate as practice heads interpret the new agenda in their own terms.
• Internal narratives blur what will change versus what remains constant, undermining confidence.

Make Brand A System

Treat brand as infrastructure: a way to encode strategic choices into the language people use daily. This isn’t about a new manifesto; it’s about agreeing the meaning of your value, the problems you uniquely solve, and the proof that travels into sales conversations, delivery rituals and leadership updates.

Evidence supports the stakes. BCG notes that in high‑growth, asset‑light services, the chief executive’s influence on brand outcomes can vary by around 23–25 points—meaning leadership shifts materially move market perception when the system is loose. The practical takeaway: don’t rely on charisma; operationalise coherence.

Moves That Create Coherence

Translate the agenda into a shared, durable narrative and make it easy to use:

• Codify the promise: align the new leadership focus with the enduring value clients buy.
• Build a messaging spine: give teams modular, repeatable language for pitches, credentials and conversations.
• Set decision filters: simple tests for offers, partnerships and content so choices reinforce the position.
• Signal continuity: show what stays the same—standards, outcomes, relationships—so change feels steady, not abrupt.

The Leadership Dividend

When the brand carries strategy, change at the top accelerates alignment rather than testing it. Commercial teams gain a single story they can adapt without distortion; operations channel effort into fewer, clearer priorities; culture internalises what progress looks like next quarter, not just in town halls.

The result is not a new headline but a more legible organisation: one whose narrative makes every decision add up, so market confidence builds even as leadership evolves. In moments of transition, coherence becomes the competitive advantage that compounds.

Sources:

• Leadership Matters: When, How Much, and How? — BCG

Further Resources

1. B2B Brand Risks: Transitioning from Services to Platforms
2. B2B Trust: Building Authority Through Brand Resilience
3. Brand and Culture: Keys to Growth in Partner-Led Organisations

Brand clarity often begins with the right questions — we’d be glad to explore them with your team. Start the conversation.

Back to top