Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
The Hidden Trade-Off
Simplicity is seductive in moments of change. A single masterbrand promises coherence, shared equity, and fewer moving parts. But there’s a catch: when every offer looks and sounds the same, you risk compressing value and confusing the reasons to choose. Some offers need daylight to prove a different job, a different level of risk, or a different regulatory profile. Ignore that, and the portfolio starts to blur, pulling down pricing power and dampening momentum.
Google shows how a single brand can hold differentiated propositions—Gmail, Maps and Drive each feel distinct yet reinforce one identity—without diluting what the masterbrand stands for, as the company itself demonstrates.
Decide How Buyers Decide
Architecture should follow buying logic, not internal neatness. Start by understanding the choices your customers actually make, in sequence and in context. Then organise the brand system to make those decisions faster and more confident.
- Map the real choice moments: occasions, triggers and tasks; design lines of sight that help buyers compare what matters.
- Separate the “must be the same” (trust marks, security, service levels) from the “must be different” (proofs, language, outcomes).
- Identify where insulation is essential—regulated products, high-risk bets, or offers that could cloud the reputation of the core.
Roles, Rules, Exceptions
Once the buying logic is clear, codify roles and guardrails that protect stretch without creating sprawl. Keep the decision tree short and consistently applied.
- Masterbrand: default when one promise drives choice and cross-sell is central.
- Endorsed: use when category credibility helps but performance proof differs.
- Stand-alone: reserve for new mental models, sensitive risks, or where legacy associations would slow adoption.
- Exceptions: name them upfront, explain why they’ve earned it, and set a review horizon so special cases don’t become the norm.
Operating For Confidence
Governance is where good intent gets real. Test naming and narratives with a panel of customers, run an annual portfolio review, and equip teams with a simple playbook so they can act without constant escalation. Most organisations we work with find that once roles and rules are explicit, the drumbeat of “can we?” decisions drops and the customer story sharpens.
What emerges is a brand system that’s easy to navigate and hard to imitate—clear enough to compound recognition, yet flexible enough to express meaningful differences as markets evolve.
Sources: