As organisations grow, choices multiply and promises blur. What was clear slips into price-led comparison. Brand positioning restores focus by choosing a specific buyer, outcome and proof system, then aligning roadmaps and pricing around it. From there, recognition builds, decisions get faster, and margins improve.
→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
When leaders say they’re “one of many,” they’re naming the symptom, not the cause. The real constraint is fragmented choices that produce diluted promises: too many audiences, too many messages, and too many bets that nobody can quite remember. Buyers don’t sift through that; they default to price.
Forrester points out that at least a third of business buyers in North America and Europe are chiefly influenced by price and expect transparency with proof of return on investment. That isn’t a cue to discount. It’s a signal to anchor value around the few outcomes you reliably deliver and to make that proof visible, repeatable, and easy to weigh.
Positioning isn’t a slogan; it’s a decision about which buyer, which problem, and which result you’ll be judged on. That decision creates pricing power. McKinsey’s analysis shows that a one‑point uplift in realised price typically produces about an eight‑percent lift in operating profit, which is a reminder that clarity about value moves margins, not just perceptions.
Two practical moves sharpen the edge. First, name the pains and outcomes in the buyer’s language, not category clichés. Second, codify the evidence that supports that promise—before the campaign, not after. This is what shifts you from a comparable option to the obvious choice.
Most organisations we work with find the breakthrough comes when evidence becomes a habit, not a project. Build a compact proof system that your market encounters everywhere, not just on a case study page.
Your operating cadence should echo your positioning choice. If it doesn’t, the market will hear the dissonance. Treat resource allocation as the enforcement mechanism for focus, not an annual ritual.
As markets crowd and expectations harden, the organisations that cut through won’t be the loudest; they’ll be the ones whose choices compound into recognition—felt long before the logo appears.
If today’s topic resonates, we invite you to continue the dialogue — sometimes one conversation reframes the challenge. Start the conversation.