Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
The Real Rivalry
When budgets tighten, price feels like the cleanest lever. Yet the real contest isn’t arithmetic, it’s confidence. Buyers use price as a shortcut for risk: if they can’t see how you deliver outcomes with less uncertainty, they nudge you toward the lowest quote. Leaders then oscillate between “matching the market” and “holding our line,” which creates mixed signals for sales, finance and delivery. The brand suffers because it’s treated as decoration for pricing, not as the proof-system that makes price credible. Confidence must be designed, not asserted.
Compete On Proof
Competing on proof means tying price to outcomes, risk reduction and evidence, not to features or effort alone. It reframes negotiations from “your rate versus theirs” to “your result versus our exposure.” User Testing reports that more than two-thirds of customers would pay roughly 25% extra for brands they prefer, underscoring that perceived value and trust can sustain a premium.
In our experience with growth-stage and mid‑market organisations, the decisive move is to institutionalise proof so it shows up before price does. That early proof equips champions to justify the premium internally, and it shifts procurement from enforcing a ceiling to testing the strength of your case.
Build Proof Assets
Codify the signals that justify your price and make them visible in the buying journey:
- Three priority outcomes you outperform on, each quantified credibly and linked to a price narrative.
- Evidence packs showing speed to first impact, de‑risked delivery steps, and total cost effects for similar clients.
- Clear discount guardrails tied to predefined, published cases only, so finance and sales act as one.
- Proposal templates that lead with outcomes and risk removal, with price positioned as the logical consequence.
Change What You Track
If you want price discipline to hold, measure the right shifts in the market conversation:
- Win rate at target price versus reduced price, plus time to close by segment.
- Primary objections moving from price to fit and change risk, and how those are resolved.
- Renewal strength and expansion when proof assets are used end‑to‑end.
- Reasons won or lost coded to proof quality, not just competitor names.
When price becomes the final confirmation of a well‑evidenced outcome, you’re no longer dragged into a race to the bottom; you’re setting the terms of value in a way the market can recognise, defend and, over time, reward.
Sources: