Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
Why Messaging Matters
When leaders ask if messaging or proof matters more, they’re really asking how to show impact without overcomplicating the organisation. The answer is that messaging is the operating system for proof: it defines what you claim, the evidence you’ll bring, and where that evidence will be seen. Get that spine wrong and performance metrics drift from reality; get it right and every interaction reinforces value.
Forrester notes that organisations that organise around customer value grow revenue 28% faster, see 33% higher profitability growth, and achieve 43% stronger retention than peers, underscoring the commercial power of message–value alignment. In our experience with leadership teams at inflection points, messaging becomes the coordination layer that keeps decisions, incentives and proof moving in the same direction.
From Claims To Proof
The leap most teams miss is moving from a few clever lines to a disciplined claims-and-proof system. Think of it as three practical components:
- Claims architecture: the handful of things you will stand behind, and the things you won’t.
- Proof ladder: independent evidence, customer outcomes, and timeframes that make the claims testable.
- Evidence pathways: where that proof shows up—pitch, website, analyst brief, onboarding—so teams can deploy it on cue.
Built this way, messaging stops being a broadcast tactic and becomes a management tool. It tells product what to prioritise, enables sales to convert faster, and gives finance a cleaner line of sight to return on investment.
Operating Across Moments
Impact is cumulative. The key is to choreograph the message, the context and the proof across the journey: strategic narrative at the top, practical evidence at the moment of choice, and reassurance after the sale. McKinsey observes that 83% of business-to-business decision‑makers now see omnichannel selling as as effective or better than single-route approaches, which raises the bar for message consistency and evidence availability.
This demands shared standards for what “good proof” looks like and simple handovers between teams. Sales needs fast, credible examples; product needs outcome signals to prioritise; customer success needs clarity on promises made so delivery reinforces the claim.
Leadership Implications
The leadership task is to make messaging a governance mechanism, not an afterthought. Three moves help:
- Decide the non-claims: hardest call, biggest clarity. Draw the line on what you won’t say.
- Build an evidence inventory: codify independent proof and customer outcomes with expiry dates.
- Track consistency, not clicks: judge performance by how well proof appears where decisions happen.
Treat messaging as an asset that compounds. When claims, context and proof move together, brands stop drifting; trust builds by design and growth becomes the natural consequence rather than the quarterly scramble for attention.
Sources: