Summary

When price becomes the yardstick, many reach for more features and louder campaigns. The result is reactive parity that bleeds margins and conviction. Reset the competitive frame with brand strategy: reframe the buyer’s brief by aligning offer, language, pricing and proof. Trust grows, decisions lean your way, because outcomes beat checklists.

→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Real Contest

When markets tighten or accelerate, feature-matching feels logical. It’s also how you end up trapped in checklist comparisons where buyers default to price. The real contest isn’t adding more; it’s changing what gets compared in the first place. That means shifting the frame of judgment from “what it is” to “what it changes,” and doing so in a way that builds trust.

Trust shortens the gap between intent and decision. It reduces perceived risk, clarifies value, and makes your pricing feel earned rather than defended. If the frame is simply “like-for-like,” you invite procurement to standardise and discount. If the frame is “achieve this outcome with less uncertainty,” you earn the right to set terms.

Trust Reframes Value

Trust is not sentiment; it’s a decision architecture. Deloitte notes that 10–40% of how consumers assess a brand’s value is driven by non‑price factors such as quality, attitude and trust, which means narrative and proof can directly shift perceived value. That’s the lever leaders often overlook when they chase parity over posture.

Most organisations we work with discover that reframing is less about storytelling and more about governance: aligning offer design, language, pricing logic and evidence so buyers are nudged to compare differently from the first glance. Trust grows when every signal is consistent with that logic over quarters, not weeks.

Rewriting The Brief

To reset expectations upstream, use brand to rewrite the buyer’s mental brief. Make the first comparison about outcomes and certainty rather than inputs and features.

• Define the problem in your terms, then align price, scope and proof to that definition.
• Redesign your offer architecture and naming to cue outcomes, not modules.
• Publish evidence that matches the frame: customer results, expert endorsements, decisive pricing moves.
• Equip sales to teach the frame and procurement to justify it confidently.

Do this visibly in leadership routines and market moments so the new frame becomes the stable reference point.

Leadership Guardrails

Price sensitivity is real, but quality still pulls buyers back. Ernst & Young reports that while 73% of consumers adjusted buying due to price rises, 55% of private‑label triallists return to brands for quality—evidence that trust signals can outweigh initial price reactions.

• Set three non‑negotiables for the frame (problem, promised outcome, proof) and hold them in board reviews.
• Measure trust leading indicators: clarity of choice, sales cycle confidence, post‑purchase advocacy.
• Align pricing posture to risk transfer—make it easy to choose certainty and hard to compare on cost alone.

Trust compounds when the frame is steady through turbulence; organisations that hold that line don’t just defend margins—they redefine how decisions get made next time.

Sources:

• Deloitte: Consumers Shift Spending to Brands That Offer More Value for the Price — Deloitte
• The New Rules of Brand Loyalty — Ernst & Young

Further Resources

1. Evolving Brand Positioning to Unlock Growth with Trust
2. Brand Distinction: How to Avoid Mediocrity in Competitive Markets
3. Beyond Product: Building Category Leadership Through Narrative

Every organisation hits brand questions it can’t solve alone — if you’d like an outside perspective, we’re here. Let’s talk.

Back to top