Summary

As acquisition costs rise and signals turn inconsistent, the instinct is to push more campaigns. The common pattern, though, is brand treated as activity rather than as an asset. Define a clear thesis, guardrails and a cadence of review, and pricing power strengthens — coherence compounds.

→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Compounding Effect

Competitive advantage rarely arrives with fanfare; it builds quietly through disciplined choices. When brand is treated as a campaign function, diminishing returns creep in. When it’s managed as an asset, gains compound across sales cycles and decision-making. McKinsey & Company observes that, over two decades, the forty leading global brands generated nearly twice the shareholder returns of the MSCI World Index — a signal that brand clarity and consistency pay off in real financial terms.

The mechanism is straightforward. Clear positioning reduces friction in the funnel, steadies pricing, and aligns teams on what creates value. Over time, those small efficiencies add up — not just to better recognition, but to harder outcomes: price realisation, improved win rates, lower acquisition costs, and stronger retention.

Manage Like An Asset

Assets need a thesis, allocation rules, and guardrails. Brand is no different. Define where you will win and why; align investment to value drivers; set standards that keep expression focused but flexible; and measure progress through a cadence you’d be happy to defend in a board pack. In our experience with leadership teams at pivotal moments, the inflection comes when brand shifts from marketing activity to a board-level investment case with an explicit thesis and time-bound expectations.

This isn’t about managing risk for its own sake. It’s about compounding return on investment by directing scarce attention and budget into the most accretive signals: proof points that build credibility, experiences that create loyalty, and narratives that translate strategy into commercial momentum.

Operating Guardrails

Turn intent into operating discipline with a few simple, non-negotiable rules:

• Ownership and mandate: clarify who sets brand direction, who stewards it, and how decisions get made.
• Investment model: tie spend to value drivers (pricing power, entry into segments, conversion uplift) with pre-agreed thresholds.
• Portfolio of bets: balance foundational brand work with near-term activation, each with explicit hypotheses.
• Review cadence: quarterly learning loops that rebalance effort based on evidence, not opinion.

These guardrails create consistency without rigidity, enabling teams to move faster with fewer missteps.

Signals Of Value

Track a small set of leading and lagging indicators that prove the asset is compounding:

• Leading: message recall in target accounts, meeting-to-opportunity conversion, sales cycle time, talent acceptance rates.
• Lagging: realised price versus list, win rates against peer sets, lifetime value and churn, valuation multiples at fundraise.

Use these signals to refine the thesis, not to justify sunk cost. When the organisation sees brand operating with this level of intent, coordination improves and choices get easier. Treated as a compounding asset, brand becomes a structural advantage that widens, quarter by quarter, in your favour.

Sources:

Further Resources

1. Elevating Relevance: Personalisation Strategies for Modern Brands
2. Transforming Trust: How Brands Drive Repeat Purchases
3. Local Trust: The Strategic Advantage for Home-Grown Brands

Every organisation hits brand questions it can’t solve alone — if you’d like an outside perspective, we’re here. Let’s talk.

Back to top