<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=7462826&amp;fmt=gif">
Published on: October 3, 2023
Video Rebranding

Who Owns the Rebrand? Aligning Teams for Success

Summary

When growth stalls or markets move, the reflex is to hand the rebrand to marketing. The real problem is misaligned outcomes and unclear decision rights. The shift happens when strategy leads, cross‑functional governance is in place, and early proof shows how the change will land. That’s when coherence—and commercial confidence—return.



Watch The Video

In this video, Preetum Mistry (CEO & Managing Partner) lays out why organisational alignment is what makes a rebrand work when the next phase looks different.


→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

Ownership Reframed

Treat a rebrand as an enterprise decision, not a departmental assignment. When the story you tell no longer matches where you’re heading, the question isn’t “who owns it?” but “who aligns it?” Executive leadership must set the commercial intent and the edges of choice; brand translates intent into a coherent narrative; marketing orchestrates the roll‑out; and sales, product, and service prove it through behaviour. This matters because rebranding is now routine: Chief notes that around 75% of companies have refreshed since 2020, with roughly half revisiting brand strategy in the process.

Decide Before Design

If the market has moved, your direction needs to be explicit before any creative work begins. Make three decisions early: where you’ll compete, how you’ll win, and what you’re willing to walk away from. Those choices should flow into a clear positioning and a small set of principles leaders can use to make trade‑offs without debate.

  • Define the outcomes you expect (revenue mix, deal velocity, pricing power).
  • Name the priority segments and the problems you solve for them.
  • Articulate a positioning with proof points you can stand behind.

Govern The Change

Clarity comes from governance, not more meetings. In our experience with mid‑market leadership teams, the gap isn’t effort — it’s the absence of crisp decision rights. Set up a cross‑functional steering group that meets at a steady cadence, with one accountable sponsor who sets trade‑offs and one empowered programme lead who runs a single roadmap.

  • Sponsor owns scope, pace, and investment decisions.
  • Programme lead integrates workstreams and resolves conflicts fast.
  • Functional leads provide evidence, not opinions, tied to customer impact.
  • Keep a visible decision log so choices stick as the work scales.

Prove It Early

The fastest way to de‑risk is to test the story in the field before you change everything. Pilot messaging in key segments, equip sales and service teams, and collect evidence that the narrative moves deals and satisfaction. Bynder reports that the average rebrand runs for about seven months and touches roughly 215 assets, which makes early validation a pragmatic way to learn before you scale.

The Payoff

When ownership is reframed as shared accountability to outcomes, you reduce rework, cut confusion, and make the organisation easier to buy from. The external signals get sharper, the internal story holds under pressure, and investment goes where it can be proven. The consequence is simple: coherence becomes a growth lever, and the next phase of the business arrives on steadier terms.

Sources:

Further Resources

  1. Aligning Leadership Teams Around Change Narratives
  2. Piloting a Rebrand in High-Stakes Moments
  3. Rebranding vs Brand Refresh: Principles for Success


Every organisation hits brand questions it can’t solve alone — if you’d like an outside perspective, we’re here. Let’s talk.

Back to top


Video Rebranding