Summary

Most organisations mistake exhaustive win–loss notes for progress. The real signal is buried under reason codes and discount tweaks. Clarity returns when the value misfit—expected versus expressed—forces a choice. That’s when your organisation regains momentum—and earns pricing power and shorter sales cycles.

→ Watch more videos in this playlist on YouTube

Our Perspective

What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.

The Hidden Misfit

Treating win–loss notes as tidy sales admin creates a comforting illusion of control. You log “price,” “feature,” “timing,” and move on. Yet when you step back, the pattern often points to a deeper issue: the value buyers expected and the value your brand expressed didn’t match. That gap shows up first in discounts and delays, then in jittery messaging as teams chase isolated objections.

The real cost is compounding. You train buyers to negotiate harder instead of believe more. You direct investment to patchwork fixes while the core value narrative remains fuzzy. The earlier you name the misfit, the faster pricing power and confidence return.

Read Signals, Not Reasons

Win–loss notes are most useful when read as signals about value, not as a punch-list of reasons. Ask: what outcome did the buyer believe they were buying, what risk were they trying to avoid, and which proof would have made that choice feel safe? Recode the notes around these value variables and your brand, product, and pricing decisions start to connect.

Google and Kantar report that only 40% of senior marketing leaders say their business has a clear effectiveness goal, and just 20% strongly agree there’s shared understanding on how to measure it—conditions that make cuts likelier when markets tighten. Most organisations we work with discover that the issue isn’t price, it’s unclear outcome language that leaves buyers unsure what they’re paying for.

From Notes To Narrative

Turn raw feedback into a simple, shared value story your market can recognise. Keep the mechanics light, but consistent.

• Code every note to buyer outcomes, not features; record the exact words buyers used for success.
• Separate “feature asks” from “value gaps”; only the latter should influence positioning.
• Extract three proof points that reduce buyer risk; make them specific and repeatable.
• Map the moments of doubt in the journey; decide which the brand resolves and which product or sales must handle.

Leadership Implications

Treat this as an alignment exercise disguised as research. It’s less about more data, more about making decisions you’ll keep.

• Set a single value hypothesis and test it across deals; evolve it quarterly, not weekly.
• Redesign win–loss reviews to prioritise themes over anecdotes; publish the implications for brand, product, and pricing.
• Tie discount approvals to the narrative: if the claimed gap isn’t a value gap, hold your line.

Commercial Payoff

Stronger value clarity doesn’t just soothe the sales pipeline; it compounds across reputation, referrals, and price integrity. Firstwater Advisory notes that organisations with consistent, clear brands can lift revenue by around 23% simply by presenting a unified story.

Leaders who recast win–loss notes as value signals shift the conversation from concessions to conviction—and over time, that shift resets how the market values you.

Sources:

• The financial impact of brand clarity — Firstwater Advisory
• The Effectiveness Equation — Google/Kantar

Further Resources

1. Brand Architecture for Scalability Post-M&A
2. Brand Mergers: When to Rebrand vs Integrate
3. Repositioning Your Brand for Growth Beyond the Familiar

Every organisation hits brand questions it can’t solve alone — if you’d like an outside perspective, we’re here. Let’s talk.

Back to top