Video
Employer Brand Alignment: Key to Strategic Success
Align employer brand to strategy to hire needed capabilities, cut friction and improve delivery. Actionable steps to link EVP with your customer...
Summary
As organisations scale, branding and marketing blur. What was clear drifts into short-term activity with little direction. Brand strategy sets direction: who, why, promise. Marketing then builds demand on that foundation. From there, pricing power holds, pipelines strengthen, and teams move faster with consistent delivery.
Watch The Video
In this video, Preetum Mistry (CEO & Managing Partner) explores the difference between branding and marketing and the strategic shift leaders need to grasp.Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
The Real Divide
Confusing brand with marketing looks tidy on an org chart, yet it quietly blurs who sets direction and who activates it. When the same leader is expected to define meaning and chase quarterly numbers, teams default to short-term noise and long-term ambiguity. The commercial costs show up in diluted pricing power, longer sales cycles, and campaigns being asked to do all the heavy lifting. McKinsey & Company notes the leadership misalignment here: the gap between CEOs and marketing leaders has widened by about 20%, and only 50% of Chief Marketing Officers sit in strategic planning.
Brand Sets Direction
Brand is a leadership system. It defines who you serve, why you’re credible, and the promise the organisation must keep. It shapes choices about markets, price, product priorities, and experience design. In other words, it answers: where will we win, and on what terms?
When brand is treated as a design exercise, execution runs ahead of meaning. Decisions fragment, and delivery drifts from promise. Treat brand as the executive team’s operating logic, with the Chief Marketing Officer translating that logic into what customers see, hear, and feel.
Marketing Activates Demand
Marketing turns the brand’s direction into momentum in market. Done well, it allocates scarce time and budget to the highest-yield paths.
- Convert the value story into clear propositions, proof, and pricing mechanics.
- Orchestrate channels and content to reach the right segments with the right weight.
- Build feedback loops so performance data sharpens creative, message, and mix.
The test is simple: if brand clarifies meaning and priority, marketing compounds that clarity through reach, consistency, and relevance.
Leadership Implications
Leaders who separate direction from activation create speed and accountability. Three practical shifts help:
- Governance: Executive team owns brand choices; the Chief Marketing Officer owns go-to-market craft and cadence.
- Metrics: Pair brand health and consideration with pipeline velocity and return on investment, so long-term equity and short-term yield are visible together.
- Investment: Balance brand-building and demand programmes by stage—launch, scale, or reposition—so you’re not over-indexed on the urgent at the expense of the important.
Compounding Advantage
When brand sets the terms of value and marketing operationalises them, customers encounter a coherent organisation. Confidence rises, referrals strengthen, and price conversations get easier. In our experience with growth-minded leadership teams, this reframing turns debates about tactics into alignment on ambition.
What begins as clearer ownership becomes a flywheel: direction focuses activity, activation proves value, and every cycle reinforces the next.
Sources:
- 'The changing role of the CMO — McKinsey & Company
Further Resources
Curious how this applies in your market? We’re speaking with leaders across industries every week. Let’s talk.
Video
Brand Strategy