Our Perspective
What this means for leaders navigating growth, change or transformation in their organisation.
The Real Risk
In regulated categories, the danger isn’t standing out; it’s blending in. When everybody looks interchangeable, customers defer choices, teams slow decisions, and regulators meet ambiguity rather than clarity. Uniformity feels safe, yet sameness leaves more to interpret and therefore more to question. In effect, hesitation migrates from the boardroom to the market and into the hands of those reviewing you.
HM Treasury notes that compliance costs are large—around 10–12% of gross domestic product, about £70 billion—with roughly 30% of that being administrative burden, which underscores how process-heavy approaches can inflate the price of risk aversion.
Design For Scrutiny
Differentiation becomes safer when it’s built to be audited. The hallmark is a small set of claims that are specific, measurable and easily evidenced. Make the offer simple enough that a regulator and a buyer can both trace the same line from promise to proof.
- Anchor to two verifiable claims customers actually compare.
- Pre-assemble the evidence chain: data source, method, thresholds.
- Write claims in plain language, not marketing shorthand.
The effect is fewer follow-up questions, faster decisions, and stronger internal confidence because everyone knows where the boundaries are and why they exist.
Sequence The Involvement
Speed doesn’t come from pushing harder at sign-off. It comes from ordering the work so compliance shapes the brief, not just the verdict. When risk is framed early, creative choices move faster because the team is selecting within known constraints rather than guessing the rules.
- Front-load constraints: what must be proven, what must be avoided.
- Co-author the brief with compliance and product leads.
- Run a two-pass review: evidence first, then expression.
This sequencing reduces rework, shortens approval loops, and signals to regulators that you’re treating scrutiny as a design input, not a hurdle.
Metrics That Matter
Leaders should track progress in terms that match the real bottlenecks. Useful indicators include reduction in clarification cycles with regulators, time from concept to approval, variance in claim interpretation across teams, and customer understanding of your key promise. If those move in the right direction, the brand is doing its risk work. If they don’t, you’re likely relying on style where substance should lead.
Link these measures to commercial outcomes—conversion, retention, and price realisation—so the organisation sees the value of precision, not just its compliance benefit.
Leadership Posture
Treat brand as a control system that earns permission to innovate. That means choosing fewer, stronger promises and asking for higher standards of proof upfront. In our experience with regulated organisations, the decisive shift is when leaders sponsor clear trade-offs—what you will not claim—so teams can move with conviction inside agreed lines.
Do this well and differentiation stops being a gamble; it becomes the clearest path to predictable approvals and faster growth windows in markets where timing is everything.
Sources: